data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55830/55830ea1667e420ed713c80bbe6bb8a4b6dc46e6" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddf35/ddf354114a8d2551b057bab28883da201e9b87f6" alt=""
The American peasantry believe no shortage of absurdities because every media outlet they have is owned by a billionaire telling them how to feel about what they’re allowed to know.
The American peasantry believe no shortage of absurdities because every media outlet they have is owned by a billionaire telling them how to feel about what they’re allowed to know.
“you didn’t believe the proof I didn’t have so I won’t even look at your proof I can’t understand”
Did Republicans ever show any evidence ever?
I suppose statistically impossible results would be more significant if you understood statistics.
The ironic thing is the human body runs on fat and a huge portion of our illness stems from the insane amount of sugar we consume.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cST99piL71E&list=PLE8LmUoWei5Qp5Nz7C4FMNs6hGNx7M3Jg&index=2
Summary: In 1984 our group published the first modern study of the effects of adapting to a low carbohydrate high fat diets on athletic performance. I have spent the next 31 years expanding on this research. In my presentation I will present the results of that research program and conclude with our exciting new evidence for the role of low carbohydrate diets and ketosis in the prevention of whole body inflammation in athletes training daily at very high loads. I will also present evidence to show that elite ultra-endurance athletes have an unexpectedly high capacity to oxidize fat during exercise and so potentially to run at fast paces for prolonged periods without the need to ingest exogenous fuels.
The 1928 Bellevue Stefansson Experiment McClellan W, et al. JBC 87:651,1930 http://www.jbc.org/content/87/3/651.f… Keto-adaptation Demonstrated Vermont Study Phinney et al JCI 66:1152, 1980
Look at the scatter plots more closely.
Every dot (pair) is one precinct reporting.
Up and down is % of the vote.
Left to right is time in order of report.
Every dot is a unique data point. There should be no link in the results between precincts, right? Everyone should just be a total of votes for Trump or Harris.
That’s exactly what was seen for the results of early voting ballots. Normal.
However, there’s an obvious bias for Trump in the other reporting that increases in an obvious, consistent trend increasingly for Trump that’s basically impossible to have organically.
Even if what you said were true, it couldn’t account for the clean trend line working toward a goal.
The more densely populated an area is, the bluer it votes. The areas with the most people and lean blue should take longer to report. The smaller the precinct , the more red it usually goes but also faster to report. However, the most Trump leaning result came in last including large blue areas.
Analysing the data raises a lot of red flags that Democrats are all Helen Keller about.