• ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    14 minutes ago
    • Election Audits occurs by selecting random batches of votes to verify, and they doesn’t show discrepencies.

    • There are poll watchers across the political spectrum, the Democratirc and Independent poll watchers are there, there are no widespread reports of election irregularities.

    • States run elections, even if red states or swing states are rigged, it still doesn’t explain why safe blue states also went red by double digit percentage points. The trend seems to be nationwide.

    My Conclusion: Although the election was not totally fair, the unfair aspects didn’t happen in the form of “rigged votes”. They happened as unlimited billionaire political spendings funding propaganda and misinformation, voter roll purges, the First-Past-The-Post voting system and the Electoral College that causes the emergence of a Two-Party System which causes voter apathy because people don’t feel like those are rea choices, and inflation that just so happen to occur duing Biden’s presidency, and voters not understanding that: correlation =/= causation; and thus blamed Biden for it, further fueling voter apathy, and lower turnout from Democratic voters.

  • infinitevalence@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Are there any sources for this, or are we just supposed to take a random AM radio station and random website that lists its executive board without real names, links to other verifiable profiles, or any way of proving its legitimacy?

  • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    I can’t help but think this knee jerk reaction to even questioning the results of an election that Trump bragged about rigging as an ideology that takes pride in their accusations being confessions was the real point of keeping the fake outrage going for four years.

    Rig the election and then watch the liberals refuse to consider the idea because “that’s what they do”

  • djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The issue I have is that there is an incredibly corrupt, absolutely vile, but completely legal explanation for the massive difference in down-ballot participation; Musk and other billionaires flooded social media platforms with heavy pro-Trump propoganda. Easily influenced people were pushed to vote for Trump, but given no directions for how to vote locally, so they didn’t.

    Should these votes be counted is another question entirely. I personally don’t view it any differently than vote buying, as these voters are essentially agents fulfilling their orders, but there’s nothing on the books that bars anyone from manipulating low-intelligence people from voting how they’re told.

    • EndRedStateSubsidies@leminal.spaceOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Look at the scatter plots more closely.

      Every dot (pair) is one precinct reporting.

      Up and down is % of the vote.

      Left to right is time in order of report.

      Every dot is a unique data point. There should be no link in the results between precincts, right? Everyone should just be a total of votes for Trump or Harris.

      That’s exactly what was seen for the results of early voting ballots. Normal.

      However, there’s an obvious bias for Trump in the other reporting that increases in an obvious, consistent trend increasingly for Trump that’s basically impossible to have organically.

      Even if what you said were true, it couldn’t account for the clean trend line working toward a goal.

      The more densely populated an area is, the bluer it votes. The areas with the most people and lean blue should take longer to report. The smaller the precinct , the more red it usually goes but also faster to report. However, the most Trump leaning result came in last including large blue areas.

      Analysing the data raises a lot of red flags that Democrats are all Helen Keller about.

  • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is the same bullshit that the republicans were peddling back in 2020.

    There wasn’t enough fraud to change the election the big difference is more people decided they didn’t care who won and sat the election out.

  • Flax@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    Is this what they do in America now? The losers just accuse the winners of cheating because it goes against their specially algorithmically curated internet echo chamber?

    • db2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Except in this case there was an Elon fucking with the results.

    • EndRedStateSubsidies@leminal.spaceOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Did Republicans ever show any evidence ever?

      I suppose statistically impossible results would be more significant if you understood statistics.

      • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        In the very few cases where the trump campaign showed any evidence whatsoever, they actually did very well with the court rulings. Keep in mind that these were absolutely not cases of widespread fraud, but of localized errors that are common in every election.

        The fact that most suits were filed with literally no evidence whatsoever was very telling, though.