Hello everybody,

What is the company and corporation that is the object of your hate? What did/do they do to get that spot for you?

Mine is Facebook/Meta for their egregious data collection policies, psychological manipulation of its users, and more recently, them not seeding content.

Thanks in advance for your time! Have a good one!

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Apple.

    They take advantage of their uncharacteristically loyal customer base unapologetically.

    They are no longer innovative they haven’t come out with a new product at least one thats good in decades and the only thing keeping them afloat is the iPhone. Their computers are overpriced trash and aside for those two products they have literally nothing else to offer. Apple TV has no purpose and is completely pointless and the VR headset they make has almost no applications that are useful.

    Albeit they make a really good USB c to USB c cable that being said it’s ridiculously overpriced.

    • ezmac@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m not an apple fanboy- in fact I own Android and mostly use windows and Linux. However,

      Apple single-handedly pushed the computer market away from x86 processors. Face ID changed the way people use their devices.

      Their computers, while no longer use upgradable, still last much longer and have higher overall quality than their competition.

      The OS pushes you toward using iCloud, but doesn’t mandate it or advertise everywhere like windows 11.

      The HomePod introduced room-equalizing to the masses and sounds way better than it should for the size.

      The integration between all their products continues to get better. Using an iPad as a second monitor, local processing rather than cloud, actual E2E encryption, while locked inside their bubble, was developed and released 10 years before it became in vogue.

      The list goes on

      Yea, no new devices but I think they are pushing tech forward still. Hard to say they aren’t innovating.

      • mechoman444@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I get where you’re coming from, but most of these points don’t actually prove Apple is pushing tech forward in a meaningful way.

        • Apple moving away from x86. Sure, switching to ARM-based chips is impressive, but it’s not innovation; it’s adaptation. ARM processors were already gaining traction, and Apple just executed well. They didn’t invent ARM chips, they just used their massive resources to optimize for their closed ecosystem.

        • Face ID changed device usage. Did it, though? Biometric authentication wasn’t new when Face ID launched, and plenty of people still prefer fingerprint sensors for speed and convenience. Apple also took years to implement under-display Touch ID, something others had already done.

        • Longevity of Apple computers. Their hardware is solid, but at what cost? Non-upgradable, non-repairable, and absurdly expensive. A MacBook lasting longer is irrelevant when a PC can be upgraded for half the cost over the same period. Apple deliberately makes self-repairs difficult, which contradicts the claim of “higher quality.”

        • Integration between devices. It’s good, but only if you’re 100% in the Apple ecosystem. Outside of it, their products lose functionality. “Local processing” and “E2E encryption” aren’t Apple innovations—they just market them better. Google and others had secure encryption and local AI processing long before Apple made it a selling point.

        • No new devices but still “pushing tech forward”. You can’t claim innovation while admitting they haven’t released new groundbreaking products. Apple refines, but they rarely disrupt anymore. The Vision Pro is a niche luxury toy, not an industry-changing device.

        Apple’s business model is to extract as much money as possible from its captive audience while making sure everything outside their walled garden is inconvenient. That’s not innovation thats control.

        • imvii@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          A MacBook lasting longer is irrelevant when a PC can be upgraded for half the cost over the same period.

          I’m using the same PC I had in 1998. Sort of.

          I’ve been upgrading things as needed. Around 2000 I put it in a 4 unit rack mount server case - which will pretty much hold anything I need. The motherboard and CPU have been upgraded 5-6 times. New power supply here and there. Old drives are moved to storage drives and I install faster newer drives for OS from time to time.

          I have no idea how much I’ve saved just upgrading things as needed or if something fails.

          • mechoman444@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            20 hours ago

            I just upgraded a nvidia 8400 in my streaming (by streaming I mean like Netflix and stuff) PC… It worked for 18 years. There’s nothing wrong with it now… Just no driver support.

    • JustTesting@lemmy.hogru.ch
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Apple TV the devices or the streaming service? Because the streaming service has pretty good content, especially compared to the other streaming services. Pretty stupid to have named those two the same, though, so many people dont know that it’s just a regular streaming service that works on every device.

      everything else Apple sucks though