data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd4a3/dd4a3bf8cab27b2a0f0eda0f823e57ff482830b5" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1df69/1df69f53f5559e83c288e08b403109544e78dc05" alt=""
Open source still doesn’t have a good funding model.
If you’re here, there’s still hope for the internet
Don’t let it fall
Open source still doesn’t have a good funding model.
We have the “scaled” sort that was made precisely to account for this. Try it on your subscribed feed
A quotation circulates on the Internet, attributed to me, but it wasn’t written by me.
The main error is that Linux is not strictly speaking part of the GNU system—whose kernel is GNU Hurd. The version with Linux, we call “GNU/Linux.” It is OK to call it “GNU” when you want to be really short, but it is better to call it “GNU/Linux” so as to give Torvalds some credit.
We don’t use the term “corelibs,” and I am not sure what that would mean, but GNU is much more than the specific packages we developed for it. I set out in 1983 to develop an operating system, calling it GNU, and that job required developing whichever important packages we could not find elsewhere.
Can’t tell if you’re serious
Is this a general argument or are you defending the specific cuts musk had made?
It’s my understanding their enterprise products are still good. It’s the consumer products which suck
like anti-competitive laws? We have those. They tend to rely on certain people enforcing them though
yeah, I wouldn’t read too much into it guys