Have you ever considered that the Prime Directive is not only not ethical, but also illogical, and perhaps morally indefensible?
“We don’t have time to put people on trial” is not a take I’m prepared to get behind.
And even if it were…how would revoking his citizenship change any of what you just described?
I’m pretty sure the portion of the Act that site refers to was repealed in 2017.
Canadian citizens who (are alleged to) have committed treason should be tried under to Canadian law, and there’s no reason to invent loopholes to avoid having to put someone on trial.
Maybe illegally revoking the citizenship of people we don’t like is a bad thing?
The sort of thing they want to do?
I don’t know if I agree with that assessment, but they do seem to have one writer who does nothing but write about how bad Carney is, and another who does nothing but write about how bad Freeland is.
Whereas stripping him of his citizenship would accomplish nothing at all.
I don’t think people have really thought through what is symbolic of.