• raef@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    How much faster was it? I was reading along with the gibber and not losing any time

    • Scribbd@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I think it is more about ambiguity. It is easier for a computer to intepret set tones and modulations than human speech.

      Like telephone numbers being tied to specific tones. Instead of the system needing to keep track of the many languages and accents that a ‘6’ can be spoken by.

      • raef@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 hours ago

        That could be, even just considering one language to parse from. I heard efficiency and just thought speed

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      24 hours ago

      GibberLink could obviously go faster. It’s certainly being slowed down so that the people watching could understand what was going on.

      • raef@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I would hope so, but as a demonstration, it wasn’t very impressive. They should have left subtitles up transcripting everything